Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
European journal of preventive cardiology ; 29(Suppl 1), 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1999552

ABSTRACT

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Dutch Heart Foundation Background More than 250 million cases of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection were confirmed across the globe since 2020, leading to a substantial number of COVID-19 related hospital admissions. Many COVID-19 survivors experience long-term health consequences, but data on physical activity patterns and the impact on recovery post-infection are scarce. Purpose This study aimed to objectively assess physical (in)activity patterns among COVID-19 survivors and to explore the association with patient characteristics, disease severity and cardiac dysfunction. We hypothesized that COVID-19 survivors will demonstrate low volumes of physical activity and a high sedentary time, especially those with a more severe disease course (e.g. longer hospital duration;admission to intensive care), cardiac dysfunction, and persistent symptoms at 3-6 months post-discharge. Methods In this cross-sectional cohort study, we objectively assessed physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep duration for 24 hrs/day during 8 subsequent days in COVID-19 survivors at 3-6 months post-hospitalisation. Activity patterns were compared across pre-defined subgroups based on patient- and disease characteristics, cardiac biomarker release during hospitalisation, abnormal transthoracic echocardiogram regarding left- and right ventricular function and volumes at 3-6 months of follow-up, and persistence of symptoms post-discharge. Results Physical activity patterns were assessed in 37 patients (60±10 years old;78% male) at 125 [116;132] days after discharge. Patients spent 4.2 [3.2;5.3] hrs/day in light-intensity physical activity and 1.0 [0.8;1.4] hrs/day in moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity. Median sleep duration was 8.6 [8.2;9.1] hrs/day. Time spent sitting was 9.8 [8.7;11.2] hrs/day, which was accumulated in 6.0 [4.7;6.9] prolonged sitting bouts (≥30 min) and 41.4 [31.5;48.1] short sitting bouts (<30 min, Central Figure). No differences in activity patterns were found across subgroups, but sleep duration was slightly higher in women versus men (9.2 vs 8.5 hrs/day, p=0.03) and patients with versus without persistent symptoms (9.1 vs 8.3 hrs/day, p=0.02). Conclusions COVID-19 survivors are physically inactive for most of their time at 3-6 months post-hospitalisation. Physical (in)activity patterns are not impacted by patient- nor disease characteristics, underlining the need for a uniform approach for re-activation of COVID-19 survivors. Central Figure. A: objectively measured light-intensity physical activity (LIPA), moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA), sleep duration and sedentary time in COVID-19 patients at 3-6 months post-hospitalisation (median and interquartile range). B: sitting bout frequency (mean + standard deviation). Central Figure

2.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging ; 37(12): 3459-3467, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1525550

ABSTRACT

In patients hospitalized for corona virus infectious disease 19 (COVID-19) it is currently unknown whether myocardial function changes after recovery and whether this is related to elevated cardiac biomarkers. In this single center, prospective cohort study we consecutively enrolled hospitalized COVID-19 patients between 1 April and 12 May 2020. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) evaluation during hospitalization and at a median of 131 days (IQR; 116-136) follow-up. Of the 51 patients included at baseline, 40 (age: 62 years (IQR; 54-68), 78% male) were available for follow-up TTE. At baseline, 68% of the patients had a normal TTE, regarding left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volumes and function, compared to 83% at follow-up (p = 0.07). Median LV ejection fraction (60% vs. 58%, p = 0.54) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (23 vs 22 mm, p = 0.18) were comparable between hospitalization and follow-up, but a significantly lower RV diameter (39 vs. 34 mm, p = 0.002) and trend towards better global longitudinal strain (GLS) (- 18.5% vs - 19.1%, p = 0.07) was found at follow-up. Subgroup analysis showed no relation between patients with and without elevated TroponinT and/or NT-proBNP during hospitalization and myocardial function at follow-up. Although there were no significant differences in individual myocardial function parameters at 4 months follow-up compared to hospitalisation for COVID-19, there was an overall trend towards normalization in myocardial function, predominantly due to a higher rate of normal GLS at follow-up.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Communicable Diseases , Echocardiography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Stroke Volume
3.
Neth Heart J ; 29(5): 273-279, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1101016

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown restrictions may impact lifestyle and therefore also physical (in)activity patterns in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of lockdown on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. METHODS: A total of 1565 Dutch CVD patients participated in this prospective cohort study, in which we compared physical activity and sedentary behaviour before and during the COVID-19 lockdown period. Baseline measures were assessed in 2018 and data on follow-up measures were collected between 17 and 24 April 2020 (5 weeks after the introduction of COVID-19 lockdown restrictions). Validated questionnaires were used to assess physical activity and sedentary behaviour. RESULTS: Moderate-to-vigorous physical activities increased from 1.6 (0.9, 2.8) to 2.0 (1.0, 3.5) h/day [median (interquartile range)] (p < 0.001) during the COVID-19 lockdown, mainly due to an increase in time spent walking and doing odd jobs. In contrast, time spent exercising significantly declined [1.0 (0.0, 2.3) to 0.0 (0.0, 0.6) h/week], whereas sedentary time increased from 7.8 (6.1, 10.4) to 8.9 (6.8, 11.4) h/day (p < 0.001). The absolute increase in physical activity was 13 (-36, 81) min/day, whereas sedentary behaviour increased by 55 (-72, 186) min/day. CONCLUSION: Despite a small increase in physical activities, the larger increase in sedentary time induced a net reduction in habitual physical activity levels in Dutch CVD patients during the first-wave COVID-19 lockdown. Since a more inactive lifestyle is strongly associated with disease progression and mortality, we encourage CVD patients and their caregivers to explore novel solutions to increase physical activity levels and reduce sedentary time during (and beyond) the COVID-19 pandemic.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL